Solution — ML / AI governance
ML model release governance in Jira
Shipping a model is not shipping code. Between "the eval numbers look good" and "this is live for customers" sit questions your future self — or a regulator — will ask: who reviewed the evaluation? who signed off the bias analysis? what did the red-team find, and who accepted the residual risk?
With the EU AI Act phasing in and internal AI review boards becoming standard, teams need release governance that produces human accountability — without building a bespoke approvals tool. If your ML work already lives in Jira, Greenlight adds exactly that layer.
How Greenlight maps to model governance
- Gates are your review board. Evaluation, bias & fairness, red-team, privacy, documentation — each a named gate owned by an accountable reviewer, not a checkbox in a script.
- Panels for shared accountability. A "Responsible AI" gate can require 2-of-3 named reviewers to approve — Greenlight tracks each decision and rolls them up.
- Evidence that stands still. Attach eval dashboards, bias reports, and red-team docs as evidence links; Greenlight freezes the evidence state in the audit record at the moment of sign-off.
- Drift stays visible. If linked work regresses after a gate was approved (a reopened issue, an unchecked item), the approval isn't silently revoked — it's flagged for a human to revoke or re-confirm.
- Locked governance gates. An admin can lock "Bias & fairness review" on the org template so no project team can quietly drop it.
Template pack: Model release
Recreate via Greenlight → Administration → New global template:
| Gate | Suggested owner | Checklist seeds | Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model evaluation | ML lead | Eval suite run on final checkpoint · Benchmarks vs. baseline recorded · Regression thresholds met | Yes 🔒 |
| Bias & fairness review | Responsible AI panel, 2-of-3 | Disaggregated metrics reviewed · Known-failure modes documented · Mitigations recorded | Yes 🔒 |
| Security & red-team | Security lead | Red-team findings triaged · Jailbreak/abuse tests run · Residual risk accepted in writing | Yes 🔒 |
| Data & privacy | Privacy officer | Training-data lineage documented · PII handling reviewed · Retention policy confirmed | Yes 🔒 |
| Model card & docs | Docs owner | Model card published · Intended-use and limitations stated · Changelog updated | Yes |
| Rollback plan | Platform lead | Previous version deployable · Kill switch tested · Monitoring alerts wired | Yes |
| Regulatory review | Legal counsel | AI Act risk class assessed · Notified-body requirements checked | Optional |
Make Regulatory review a conditional gate — required only when the
release's linked work carries a high-risk label — so low-risk experiments
aren't taxed with it.
Why in Jira, and why Forge
Your models' issues, experiments, and incidents are already in Jira; the governance record belongs next to them, not in another SaaS. Greenlight runs entirely on Atlassian Forge with zero data egress — nothing about your models, evals, or reviews leaves your Atlassian site.
Want this workflow in your Jira?
Greenlight is under Atlassian Marketplace review. Leave your email and we'll let you know the moment it's installable — and we read every note about what you're trying to solve.
Get notified at launch